Innovation and institutional ownership revisited: an empirical investigation with count data models

6Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

By discriminating between a lazy manager and a career concerns hypothesis, Aghion et al. (Am Econ Rev 103(1):277–304, 2013. doi:10.1257/aer.103.1.277) try to disentangle the link between innovation and institutional ownership. Citation-weighted patent counts are used as a proxy for innovation, which motivates the use of count data models. A replication in a narrow sense confirms their empirical results which are mainly based on Poisson models (i.e., with a single set of regression coefficients). However, when extending the model framework by count data hurdle models, it is shown that the two hurdle parts do not coincide—as they should under the Poisson model—but lead to different results. Nevertheless, a remarkably stable positive correlation of citation-weighted patents and institutional ownership across all model specifications can be shown.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Berger, S., Stocker, H., & Zeileis, A. (2017). Innovation and institutional ownership revisited: an empirical investigation with count data models. Empirical Economics, 52(4), 1675–1688. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-016-1118-0

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free