Interpersonal distancing in cooperation: Effect of confederate’s interpersonal distance preferences

0Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Personal space is a dynamic spatial component of interpersonal relations. This paper presented an empirical study that investigated a dynamic process of adjusting interpersonal distance in a cooperative situation. In the experiment, there were four factors: (a) cooperative task, (b) orientation, (c) gender combination, and (d) long-short relation of interpersonal distance preferences among an evaluator and a confederate. Twenty-eight participants (14 females) joined the study. The data collection was performed by employing a standard procedure of the stop-distance method. One hundred and twelve data were obtained under the different conditions. A multiple comparison test was performed for preferred interpersonal distances. The results revealed that: (1) interpersonal distance was shortened in a cooperative task; (2) individuals standing face-to-face produced longer interpersonal distance than those standing side-by-side; (3) male pairs produced longer preferred interpersonal distance than female pairs when pairs stood face-to-face, however, this difference was not significant when pairs stood side-by-side. In particular, the present study suggested (4) the shortening of interpersonal distance in a cooperative situation was affected by long-short relation of interpersonal distance preferences among an evaluator and an apporacher. Implications to proxemics for the design of spatial behaviors of socially assistive robots including a nursing-care robot were also discussed.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kinoe, Y. (2018). Interpersonal distancing in cooperation: Effect of confederate’s interpersonal distance preferences. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 10927 LNCS, pp. 334–347). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92037-5_25

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free