Evidence for arousal-biased competition in perceptual learning

54Citations
Citations of this article
108Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Arousal-biased competition theory predicts that arousal biases competition in favor of perceptually salient stimuli and against non-salient stimuli (Mather and Sutherland, 2011).The current study tested this hypothesis by having observers complete many trials in a visual search task in which the target either always was salient (a 55° tilted line among 80° distractors) or non-salient (a 55° tilted line among 50° distractors). Each participant completed one session in an emotional condition, in which visual search trials were preceded by negative arousing images, and one session in a non-emotional condition, in which the arousing images were replaced with neutral images (with session order counterbalanced). Test trials in which the target line had to be selected from among a set of lines with different tilts revealed that the emotional condition enhanced identification of the salient target line tilt but impaired identification of the non-salient target line tilt.Thus, arousal enhanced perceptual learning of salient stimuli but impaired perceptual learning of non-salient stimuli. © 2012 Lee, Itti and Mather.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lee, T. H., Itti, L., & Mather, M. (2012). Evidence for arousal-biased competition in perceptual learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 3(JUL). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00241

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free