Walking across Wikipedia: A scale-free network model of semantic memory retrieval

20Citations
Citations of this article
50Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Semantic knowledge has been investigated using both online and offline methods. One common online method is category recall, in which members of a semantic category like "animals" are retrieved in a given period of time. The order, timing, and number of retrievals are used as assays of semantic memory processes. One common offline method is corpus analysis, in which the structure of semantic knowledge is extracted from texts using co-occurrence or encyclopedic methods. Online measures of semantic processing, as well as offline measures of semantic structure, have yielded data resembling inverse power law distributions. The aim of the present study is to investigate whether these patterns in data might be related. A semantic network model of animal knowledge is formulated on the basis of Wikipedia pages and their overlap in word probability distributions. The network is scale-free, in that node degree is related to node frequency as an inverse power law. A random walk over this network is shown to simulate a number of results from a category recall experiment, including power law-like distributions of inter-response intervals. Results are discussed in terms of theories of semantic structure and processing. © 2014 Thompson and Kello.

Figures

  • FIGURE 1 | Histogram of all pairwise JSD values for Wikipedia and BEAGLE animal pages, with the network connection threshold shown by the dashed vertical line. For Wikipedia, smaller values mean greater similarity. For BEAGLE, it is the reverse.
  • FIGURE 2 | Probability distributions for node degrees for the Wikipedia animal network, Beagle animal network, and scrambled control network. Data are binned logarithmically, and shown in double logarithmic coordinates.
  • FIGURE 3 | Example time series of IRI’s from a participant in the category generation task and network walker model runs over both the Wikipedia animal network and scrambled control network.
  • Table 1 | Example series of animals recalled by a participant and network walker model runs over Wikipedia animal network and scrambled control network.
  • FIGURE 4 | IRI distributions in log-log coordinates (using logarithmic binning) for the experiment, Wikipedia animal network, and scrambled control network, aggregated over participants and simulation runs, respectively.
  • FIGURE 5 | Mean normalized JSD values between animal names produced 1–10 responses apart in category recall sequences. JSD values normalized by mean and standard deviation all possible JSD values between items produced. Analysis based on Figure 1 from Hills et al. (2012).
  • FIGURE 6 | Averaged response time measures between items with intervening network path lengths of 1–4. Box plots show median and quartile values with outlying values (past 1.5 IQR) represented as pluses.

References Powered by Scopus

Statistical mechanics of complex networks

16859Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

WordNet: A Lexical Database for English

11748Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Power-law distributions in empirical data

6700Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Foraging in Semantic Fields: How We Search Through Memory

104Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Large-scale network representations of semantics in the mental lexicon

61Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Distributed semantic representations for modeling human judgment

51Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Thompson, G. W., & Kello, C. T. (2014). Walking across Wikipedia: A scale-free network model of semantic memory retrieval. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(FEB). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00086

Readers over time

‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 16

44%

Researcher 12

33%

Professor / Associate Prof. 7

19%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 10

36%

Psychology 9

32%

Physics and Astronomy 5

18%

Social Sciences 4

14%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0