Can text structure be incompatible with rhetorical structure?

11Citations
Citations of this article
81Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Scott and Souza (1990) have posed the problem of how a rhetorical structure (in which propositions are linked by rhetorical relations, but not yet arranged in a linear order) can be realized by a text structure (in which propositions are ordered and linked up by appropriate discourse connectives). Almost all work on this problem assumes, implicitly or explicitly, that this mapping is governed by a constraint on compatibility of structure. We show how this constraint can be stated precisely, and present some counterexamples which seem acceptable even though they violate compatibility. The examples are based on a phenomenon we call extraposition, in which complex embedded constituents of a rhetorical structure are extracted and realized separately.

References Powered by Scopus

Rhetorical Structure Theory: Toward a functional theory of text organization

2534Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Structure and ostension in the interpretation of discourse deixis

154Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Coherence relations: Towards a general specification

61Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Multimodality and genre: A foundation for the systematic analysis of multimodal documents

532Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Inferring strategies for sentence ordering in multidocument news summarization

246Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Document structure

85Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bouayad-Agha, N., Power, R., & Scott, D. (2000). Can text structure be incompatible with rhetorical structure? In INLG 2000 - Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Natural Language Generation (pp. 194–200). Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL). https://doi.org/10.3115/1118253.1118280

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 23

53%

Researcher 8

19%

Professor / Associate Prof. 7

16%

Lecturer / Post doc 5

12%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 29

67%

Linguistics 11

26%

Social Sciences 2

5%

Neuroscience 1

2%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free