Anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies in advanced biliary tract cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

63Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Despite several clinical trials and advances in understanding the genetic basis of biliary tract cancer (BTC), the addition of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) targeted therapy does not seem to enhance the activity of first-line chemotherapy (CHT). Materials and Methods: We carried out a meta-analysis of available randomized clinical trials to assess the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine-based first-line CHT plus monoclonal antibodies against EGFR (EGFR-mAbs) in advanced or metastatic BTC. Results: In the overall population, the pooled hazard ratio for overall (OS) and progression-free (PFS) survival were 0.82 (95% confidence interval=0.64-1.06) and 0.88 (95% confidence intervaI=0.73-1.08), respectively. No differences were detected in objective response rate between the two groups. Patients treated with gemcitabine-based CHT plus EGFR-mAbs showed a statistically significant increased risk of grade 3-4 neutropenia, grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia and especially grade 3-4 skin rash. Conclusion: The addition of EGFR-mAbs to gemcitabine-based first-line CHT does not significantly improve overall and progression-free survival, nor the objective response rate in patients with advanced BTC and increases the risk of hematological and cutaneous adverse drug events.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rizzo, A., Frega, G., Ricci, A. D., Palloni, A., Abbati, F., de Lorenzo, S., … Brandi, G. (2020). Anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies in advanced biliary tract cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. In Vivo. International Institute of Anticancer Research. https://doi.org/10.21873/invivo.11798

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free