Third nature: Making space and time in the Great Limpopo conservation area

78Citations
Citations of this article
165Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In southern Africa's "Great Limpopo Transboundary Conservation Area," potential nature, envisioned as ideal habitats for wildlife, may outweigh actual nature. I refer to this notion of conditional biodiversity as "third nature" distinguishing it from the equally anthropogenic, but tangible, second nature ("nature" as including human habitation). Conservationists and investors are inventing nature on a new scale that crosses national boundaries in elaborate ventures to develop ecotourism in the Great Limpopo zone. They now imagine a continent-wide field for (white) tourists to be created by fencing out local populations of (black) peasants. Few observers appreciate the structural racism involved in the profound material consequences of these dreams of third natare.[conservation, tourism, politics of scale, Africa, structural racism] © 2005 by the American Anthropological Association. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hughes, D. M. D. (2005, May). Third nature: Making space and time in the Great Limpopo conservation area. Cultural Anthropology. https://doi.org/10.1525/can.2005.20.2.157

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free