Skip to main content

“How do you Measure up?” Assumptions about “obesity” and health-related behaviors and beliefs in two Australian “obesity” prevention campaigns

25Citations
Citations of this article
66Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This article presents an analysis of two related Australian government-sponsored “obesity” prevention campaigns, including documents produced by commercial social research companies reporting the formative research and evaluation of these campaigns. This material is critically analyzed for its underlying assumptions about weight “obesity” and the public’s health-related behaviors and beliefs. These include the following: the concept of “good health” has meaning and value that is universally shared; to be “overweight” or “obese” is to be physically unfit and at risk of higher levels of disease and early death; individuals are responsible for their own health status; individuals lack appropriate information about health risks and providing this information leads to behavior change; and information should be provided in a way that arouses concern and a belief that individuals should make a change. These assumptions are challenged from a critical sociological perspective.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lupton, D. (2014). “How do you Measure up?” Assumptions about “obesity” and health-related behaviors and beliefs in two Australian “obesity” prevention campaigns. Fat Studies, 3(1), 32–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/21604851.2013.784050

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free