Defining, Designing, and Evaluating Civic Values in Human Computation and Collective Action Systems

1Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Collective action is often described in terms of the relationships, learning, principled processes, and community capacities it fosters. Despite this, human computation and collective action systems are often designed and evaluated with system outputs in mind: the quality of answers, the number of votes, the accuracy of content created. In this proposal, we review literature on the design values of "citizen-x" systems, put forward a series of models for describing the civic values in "citizen-x", and classify systems by those models. We conclude by urging greater attentiveness to civic values when designing and evaluating human computation and collective action systems.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Matias, J. N., & Geiger, S. (2014). Defining, Designing, and Evaluating Civic Values in Human Computation and Collective Action Systems. In Proceedings of the 2nd AAAI Conference on Human Computation and Crowdsourcing, HCOMP 2014 (pp. 25–27). AAAI Press. https://doi.org/10.1609/hcomp.v2i1.13219

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free