Death tolls of COVID-19: Where come the fallacies and ways to make them more accurate

12Citations
Citations of this article
48Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The death toll of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) sparked much controversy since its advent in December 2019. Underestimation because of under testing and deaths happening outside the hospitals were important causes. Bold revisions of the diagnostic criteria leading to dramatic changes in death tolls by different governments were observed in attempts to generate more accurate estimates. On the other hand, the influence, censorship and manipulation on case and death data from top political leaders of some countries could create important impacts on the death toll. Baseline mortality data of previous years may help make more accurate estimates of the actual death toll. The pitfalls and strategies during such processes could become valuable lessons to leaders and policymakers worldwide as more accurate statistics serve to navigate policies to combat this pandemic in the days and months to come.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lin, T. P. H., Wan, K. H., Huang, S. S., Jonas, J. B., Hui, D. S. C., & Lam, D. S. C. (2020). Death tolls of COVID-19: Where come the fallacies and ways to make them more accurate. Global Public Health, 15(10), 1582–1587. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2020.1808040

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free