Why "isms" Are Evil: Theory, Epistemology, and Academic Sects as Impediments to Understanding and Progress

201Citations
Citations of this article
444Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This essay probes tensions between our professional practices and the quality of our professional output in the field of international studies. We organize ourselves into academic "sects" that engage in self-affirming research and then wage theological debates between academic religions. This occurs at both the level of theory and epistemology. Unfortunately, this academic sectarianism produces less understanding rather than more. Theoretically, we should focus on developing contingent, mid-level theories of specific phenomena. Epistemologically, we should recognize there are multiple valid and perhaps even complementary paths to understanding. © 2011 International Studies Association.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lake, D. A. (2011). Why “isms” Are Evil: Theory, Epistemology, and Academic Sects as Impediments to Understanding and Progress. International Studies Quarterly, 55(2), 465–480. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2478.2011.00661.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free