Early detection of multiple myeloma in primary care using blood tests: A case-control study in primary care

36Citations
Citations of this article
91Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background Multiple myeloma is a haematological cancer characterised by numerous non-specific symptoms leading to diagnostic delay in a large proportion of patients. Aim To identify which blood tests are useful in suggesting or excluding a diagnosis of myeloma. Design and setting A matched case-control study set in UK primary care using routinely collected data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink. Method Symptom prevalence and blood tests were analysed up to 5 years before diagnosis in 2703 cases and 12 157 matched controls. Likelihood ratios (LR) were used to classify tests or their combinations as useful rule-in tests (LR+ = ≥5), or rule-out tests (LR- = ≤0.2). Results Raised plasma viscosity (PV) had an LR+ = 2.0, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.7 to 2.3; erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) 1.9, 95% CI = 1.7 to 2.0; and C-reactive protein (CRP) 1.2, 95% CI = 1.1 to 1.4. A normal haemoglobin had an LR- = 0.42, 95% CI = 0.39 to 0.45; calcium LR- = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.78 to 0.83; and creatinine LR- = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.77 to 0.83. The test combination with the lowest LR- was all normal haemoglobin with calcium and PV, which had an LR- = 0.06, 95% CI = 0.02 to 0.18, though the LR- for normal haemoglobin and PV together was 0.12 (95% CI = 0.07 to 0.23). Conclusion Plasma viscosity and ESR are better for both ruling in and ruling out the disease compared with C-reactive protein. A combination of a normal ESR or PV and normal haemoglobin is a simple rule-out approach for patients currently being tested in primary care.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Koshiaris, C., Van Den Bruel, A., Oke, J. L., Nicholson, B. D., Shephard, E., Braddick, M., & Hamilton, W. (2018). Early detection of multiple myeloma in primary care using blood tests: A case-control study in primary care. British Journal of General Practice, 68(674), e586–e593. https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp18X698357

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free