Appropriating, Romanticizing and Reimagining: Pagan Engagements with Indigenous Animism

  • Fisk A
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This chapter explores the tension between cosmopolitanism and indigeneity in contemporary Pagan engagements with the animism of indigenous cultures. Fisk discusses three modes whereby Pagan “new animism” may risk Western imperialism: first, through direct appropriation of indigenous beliefs and practices; second, through a romanticized, essentialized view of indigenous cultures; and third, through a reimagining of indigenous cosmologies as “one’s own heritage”—the mythic and religious traditions of Europe (as in Heathenism and Druidry). She argues that attempts to heal the wounds of modernity and “return” to a state of authentic connection with nature should not appropriate the worldviews of indigenous peoples—as salvific symbols or in the pretense that they are the same as those of the European past—without attending to indigenous political realities.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fisk, A. (2017). Appropriating, Romanticizing and Reimagining: Pagan Engagements with Indigenous Animism. In Cosmopolitanism, Nationalism, and Modern Paganism (pp. 21–42). Palgrave Macmillan US. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-56200-5_2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free