Evaluation of four supervised learning schemes in white matter hyperintensities segmentation in absence or mild presence of vascular pathology

2Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

We investigated the performance of four popular supervised learning algorithms in medical image analysis for white matter hyperintensities segmentation in brain MRI with mild or no vascular pathology. The algorithms evaluated in this study are support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), deep Boltzmann machine (DBM) and convolution encoder network (CEN). We compared these algorithms with two methods in the Lesion Segmentation Tool (LST) public toolbox which are lesion growth algorithm (LGA) and lesion prediction algorithm (LPA). We used a dataset comprised of 60 MRI data from 20 subjects from the ADNI database, each scanned once in three consecutive years. In this study, CEN produced the best Dice similarity coefficient (DSC): mean value 0.44. All algorithms struggled to produce good DSC due to the very small WMH burden (i.e., smaller than 1,500 mm3). LST-LGA, LST-LPA, SVM, RF and DBM produced mean DSC scores ranging from 0.17 to 0.34.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rachmadi, M. F., Valdés-Hernández, M. D. C., Agan, M. L. F., & Komura, T. (2017). Evaluation of four supervised learning schemes in white matter hyperintensities segmentation in absence or mild presence of vascular pathology. In Communications in Computer and Information Science (Vol. 723, pp. 482–493). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60964-5_42

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free