Risk Factors Associated with Lost to Follow up Among Multidrug Resistance Tuberculosis Patients Registered for Treatment in Programmatic Management of Drug Resistant Tuberculosis Sites of Punjab, Pakistan

3Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Introduction: Pakistan, a country with a 27 high burden countries of multidrug resistance tuberculosis. To predict the associated risk factors and proportion of loss to follow up among MDR-TB patients treated at PMDT sites of Punjab from 2017 to 2019. Methodology: This case control study based on the standardized reporting and recording case record forms called as Electronic Nominal Review System (ENRS) of National TB Control Program, Pakistan. A logistic regression model was used to assess risk factors of lost to follow up MDR-TB patients. Results: A total of 539 patients with MDR-TB were included in the final analysis. Among them, 207 patients (7.5%) had lost to follow up outcome at the end of the study. MDR-TB lost to follow up patients were more likely to report older age (AOR: 1.40, CI: 1.14-1.71, p=0.000), history of lost to follow up from first line drugs treatment (AOR: 0.39, CI: 0.28-0.56, p=0.000), co-morbid (AOR:1.54, CI: 1.24-1.91, p=0.000), adverse reaction of second line drugs (AOR: 0.45, CI: 0.37-0.56, p=0.000), long distance between patient’s home and PMDT site (AOR: 0.68, CI: 0.52-0.89, p=0.001). Conclusion: The history of lost to follow up from first line drugs treatment, co-morbid, older age and long distance were independent risk factors of MDR-TB. Proper training for PMDT sites staff, friendly follow up services and psychological counseling may help to reduce lost to follow up.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kanwal, S., & Akhtar, A. M. (2020). Risk Factors Associated with Lost to Follow up Among Multidrug Resistance Tuberculosis Patients Registered for Treatment in Programmatic Management of Drug Resistant Tuberculosis Sites of Punjab, Pakistan. Journal of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, 6(3), 162–169. https://doi.org/10.18502/jbe.v6i3.5099

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free