Effectiveness of co-debriefing to develop clinical skills in basic life support: randomized pilot study

0Citations
Citations of this article
33Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: To compare the effectiveness of co-debriefing with debriefing with a facilitator in the development of clinical competences in nursing students in the simulated care of cardiac arrest. Method: Randomized pilot study, carried out at a university in Minas Gerais, Brazil, in August 2021, with 17 students, to compare debriefing with a facilitator (control n=8) with co-debriefing (intervention n=9). Pre-and post-test, Objective Structured Clinical Examination and scales were used to assess behavioral skills. Wilcoxon and Mann-Whitney nonparametric comparison tests were used for analysis. Results: The intervention group performed better than the control for knowledge about basic life support (control=17.00±2.39 and intervention=19.22 ± 0.66, p=0.021) and psychomotor skills (control=8.12±0.13 and intervention=8.50 ± 0.001, p<0.001). There were no significant differences for behavioral skills. Conclusion: Co-debriefing appears to be more effective than debriefing with a facilitator to develop clinical skills in basic life support in nursing.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nascimento, J. da S. G., Do Nascimento, K. G., Alves, M. G., Braga, F. T. M. M., Regino, D. da S. G., & Dalri, M. C. B. (2022). Effectiveness of co-debriefing to develop clinical skills in basic life support: randomized pilot study. Revista Gaucha de Enfermagem, 43(Special Issue). https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-1447.2022.20220032.en

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free