Small Strains in Soil Constitutive Modeling

6Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This paper reviews the state of the art of soil behavior in the range of small strains and its constitutive modeling, which is an important issue when predicting displacements under serviceability conditions. The factors that control nonlinear, hysteretic and dependent on recent history soil behavior are described. Likewise, concepts of soil constitutive modeling are explored in detail and two criteria are explained and used to classify the analyzed models: (1) a first criterion based on the concept of tensorial zones; and (2) a second criterion based on the elements that defines the hysteretic soil behavior, including reversal criteria, memory rules and the effects of reversals on soil degradation and on soil stiffness recovery. The fundamentals of the formulation of the analyzed models are provided, as well as their scope of application, advantages and disadvantages.

References Powered by Scopus

Effect of soil plasticity on cyclic response

1682Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

On the description of anisotropic workhardening

1272Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

"Small is beautiful' - the stiffness of soils at small strains

487Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Evolution law of small strain shear modulus of expansive soil: From a damage perspective

52Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Point loads on the surface of a transversely isotropic linear elastic half-space

4Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Numerical Investigation of Earth Berm Effects on Prefabricated Recyclable Supporting Structure in Circular Excavations

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Castellón, J., & Ledesma, A. (2022). Small Strains in Soil Constitutive Modeling. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 29(5), 3223–3280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-021-09697-1

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 3

50%

Researcher 2

33%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

17%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 7

78%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1

11%

Physics and Astronomy 1

11%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free