A size-based emphysema severity index: Robust to the breath-hold-level variations and correlated with clinical parameters

8Citations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: To determine the power-law exponents (D) of emphysema hole-size distributions as a competent emphysema index. Robustness to extreme breath-hold-level variations and correlations with clinical parameters for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) were investigated and compared to a conventional emphysema index (EI%). Patients and methods: A total of 100 patients with COPD (97 males and three females of mean age 67±7.9 years) underwent multidetector row computed tomography scanning at full inspiration and full expiration. The diameters of the emphysematous holes were estimated and quantified with a fully automated algorithm. Power-law exponents (D) of emphysematous hole-size distribution were evaluated. Results: The diameters followed a power-law distribution in all cases, suggesting the scale-free nature of emphysema. D of inspiratory and expiratory computed tomography of patients showed intraclass correlation coefficients.0.8, indicating statistically absolute agreement of different breath-hold levels. By contrast, the EI% failed to agree. Bland-Altman analysis also revealed the superior robustness of D to EI%. D also significantly correlated with clinical parameters such as airflow limitation, diffusion capacity, exercise capacity, and quality of life. Conclusion: The D of emphysematous hole-size distribution is robust to breath-hold-level variations and sensitive to the severity of emphysema. This measurement may help rule out the confounding effects of variations in breath-hold levels.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hwang, J., Lee, M., Lee, S. M., Oh, S. Y., Oh, Y. M., Kim, N., & Seo, J. B. (2016). A size-based emphysema severity index: Robust to the breath-hold-level variations and correlated with clinical parameters. International Journal of COPD, 11(1), 1835–1841. https://doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S109846

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free