Linguistic injustice in academic publishing in English Limitations and ways forward in the debate

28Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In recent years, an intense debate in English for research publication purposes (ERPP) has developed around the question of whether linguistic injustice exists or not in academic publishing in English. In this Perspectives piece, I wish to engage in this debate by first situating the terms in which it is being developed, and then pointing out some of its limitations. In doing that, I argue that the view of language that is currently held in the debate seems problematic, and that a more explicit attention to the socially stratified nature of academic publishing seems missing from the debate. Suggesting potential ways forward, I propose that it seems crucial to adopt a view of language that anchors it more firmly as a social phenomenon, inherently connected to its speakers and the socially situated and stratified position that they inhabit. Remembering this is important in order to remain aware of the fact that both linguistic and non-linguistic factors are at play in shaping the uneven nature of academic publishing in English.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Soler, J. (2021, December 31). Linguistic injustice in academic publishing in English Limitations and ways forward in the debate. Journal of English for Research Publication Purposes. John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/jerpp.21002.sol

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free