Assessment of left atrial dimensions by cross sectional echocardiography in patients with mitral valve disease

46Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Left atrial dimensions were measured using cross sectional echocardiography in 37 patients with mitral valve disease and 30 normal subjects of similar ages. The anteroposterior (AP), superior-inferior (SI), and medial-lateral (ML) left atrial dimensions were determined at the end of ventricular systole using parasternal long and short axis and apical four chamber views (for SIa and MLa). To assess the reliability of these measurements cross sectional echocardiographic and angiographic left atrial volumes were compared in 19 patients with mitral valve disease, giving an excellent correlation. A moderate correlation was found between the anteroposterior dimension of the left atrium obtained using M mode echocardiography and that obtained using the parasternal short axis and long axis projections. In normal subjects a good correlation was found between SI and ML dimensions, while a lower correlation was found between SI and AP, and ML and AP dimensions. The SI dimension was the major axis of the left atrium and AP dimension the minor axis. In patients with mitral valve disease a good correlation was found between SI and ML dimensions, while SI and ML dimensions had a low correlation with AP dimensions. The AP dimension was the minor axis of the left atrium, while the SI and ML dimensions were not significantly different. All left atrial dimensions were significantly greater in patients with mitral valve disease than in normal subjects. Of 30 patients with at least one dimension increased, all three dimensions were abnormal in 16, two dimensions were increased in 10, and only one dimension was increased in four. AP, SI, and ML dimensions were abnormal in 25, 20, and 27 patients, respectively. Cross sectional echocardiography may provide a reliable estimate of left atrial dimensions. In patients with mitral valve disease a thorough examination of the left atrium using multiple cross sectional views is necessary to detect asymmetric left atrial enlargement and to measure the degree of left atrial dilatation.

References Powered by Scopus

Recommendations regarding quantitation in M-mode echocardiography: Results of a survey of echocardiographic measurements

7359Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Report of the American Society of Echocardiography Committee on Nomenclature and Standards in Two-dimensional Echocardiography

901Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Left retrograde cardioangiography in acquired cardiac disease. Technic, indications and interpretations in 700 cases<sup>*</sup>

725Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: An update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging

10184Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Recommendations for chamber quantification: A report from the American Society of Echocardiography's guidelines and standards committee and the Chamber Quantification Writing Group, developed in conjunction with the European Association of Echocardiography, a branch of the European Society of Cardiology

10037Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: An update from the American society of echocardiography and the European association of cardiovascular imaging

6091Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Loperfido, F., Pennestri, F., Digaetano, A., Scabbia, E., Santarelli, P., Mongiardo, R., … Manzoli, U. (1983). Assessment of left atrial dimensions by cross sectional echocardiography in patients with mitral valve disease. Heart, 50(6), 570–578. https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.50.6.570

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 5

45%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

27%

Researcher 2

18%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

9%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 9

82%

Social Sciences 1

9%

Engineering 1

9%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free