Istiṣlāḥī Reasoning in Contemporary Jurisprudence: A Case Study of the Fatwa on Immunization Law in Aceh

2Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This article discusses the use of istiṣlāḥi reasoning to answer the contemporary problem such as the MPU's Decree (Majelis Permusyawaratan Ulama) in Aceh on immunization.The reasoning of Islamic law often used to answer contemporary problems is the istiṣlāḥi reasoning. Although the istiṣlāḥiyreasoning is more flexible in explaining the law of contemporary issues, but in the process of law enforcement, it must be assisted with other disciplines. As a result, the legal considerations are decided more accurately and scientifically to avoid any form of arbitrariness (authoritarian) in producing Islamic law.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

The Application of Emergency Concept Within the MUI Fatwa on Measles-Rubella Vaccine Immunization

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Digitalization of Islamic Banking in Indonesia: Justification and Compliance to Sharia Principles

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mubarrak, H. (2017). Istiṣlāḥī Reasoning in Contemporary Jurisprudence: A Case Study of the Fatwa on Immunization Law in Aceh. Ahkam: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, 17(1), 199–222. https://doi.org/10.15408/AJIS.V17I1.6225

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Lecturer / Post doc 5

100%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Arts and Humanities 2

40%

Social Sciences 1

20%

Linguistics 1

20%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1

20%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free