Quantifying bias in survival estimates resulting from loss to follow-up among children with lymphoma in Malawi

14Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Pediatric lymphoma is common in sub-Saharan Africa, where survival estimates are often based on limited follow-up with incomplete retention, introducing potential for bias. We compared follow-up and overall survival (OS) between passive and active tracing within a prospective cohort of children with lymphoma in Malawi. Median follow-up times were 4.4 months (interquartile range [IQR] 2.0–9.4) and 10.8 months (IQR 6.2–20.6) in passive and active follow-up, respectively. Twelve-month overall survival (OS) was 69% (95% confidence interval [CI] 54–80) in passive and 44% (95% CI 34–54) in active follow-up. Passive follow-up significantly overestimated the OS and underestimated the mortality. Efforts to improve retention in regional studies are needed.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Stanley, C. C., Westmoreland, K. D., Itimu, S., Salima, A., van der Gronde, T., Wasswa, P., … Gopal, S. (2017). Quantifying bias in survival estimates resulting from loss to follow-up among children with lymphoma in Malawi. Pediatric Blood and Cancer, 64(6). https://doi.org/10.1002/pbc.26370

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free