Better GP benchmarks: Community survey results and proposals

180Citations
Citations of this article
86Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

We present the results of a community survey regarding genetic programming benchmark practices. Analysis shows broad consensus that improvement is needed in problem selection and experimental rigor. While views expressed in the survey dissuade us from proposing a large-scale benchmark suite, we find community support for creating a "blacklist" of problems which are in common use but have important flaws, and whose use should therefore be discouraged. We propose a set of possible replacement problems. © 2012 Springer Science+Business Media New York.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

White, D. R., McDermott, J., Castelli, M., Manzoni, L., Goldman, B. W., Kronberger, G., … Luke, S. (2013, March 1). Better GP benchmarks: Community survey results and proposals. Genetic Programming and Evolvable Machines. Springer Science and Business Media, LLC. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10710-012-9177-2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free