Legal challenges in hybrid warfare theory and practice: Is there a place for legal norms at all?

3Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The chapter introduces the theory and practical consequences of asymmetric and hybrid warfare, as observed in the crisis in Ukraine. It summarizes the legal problems arising from such methods of conducting an armed conflict and asks the question about whether this new type of warfare is compatible with the existing legal system concerning armed conflict, especially regarding the distinction between times of peace and times of conflict, as well as the distinction between combatants/ military objectives and protected persons/installations. The conclusion is that if, as predicted by many, hybrid warfare becomes the 'new normal', then the current legal regime will have to change to remain meaningful.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tóth, G. (2018). Legal challenges in hybrid warfare theory and practice: Is there a place for legal norms at all? In The Use of Force against Ukraine and International Law: Jus Ad Bellum, Jus In Bello, Jus Post Bellum (pp. 173–183). T.M.C. Asser Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-222-4_8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free