Effect of particle shape on the stereological bias of the degree of liberation of biphase particle systems

16Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

It is well known that in sectional measurements of polished ore samples, the degree of liberation is overestimated by stereological bias. The stereological bias is affected by particle shape, but the effect of particle shape on the stereological bias has not been studied systematically. In this study, particles of various shapes were modeled using a geodesic grid, and the internal structures of the particles were randomly designed. The stereological bias of liberation was assessed quantitatively by comparing the computed sectional information and the original three-dimensional information. The following results were obtained: 1) the effect of aspect ratio on the stereological bias is less than 12% when comparing cases with α ranging from 1.0 to 2.0; 2) the effect of particle surface roughness on the stereological bias is smaller than 7.6% when comparing cases with surface roughness (the quotient of the surface area of the volume equivalent ellipsoid and the surface area of a particle) ranging from 0.833 to 0.996. It was also confirmed that the previously proposed stereological correction method is applicable to irregularly shaped particles because the estimation error of the degree of liberation dramatically dropped from 56.4%-64.4% without any correction to 1.16%-3.41% using the proposed method.

References Powered by Scopus

Modern SEM-based mineral liberation analysis

471Citations
379Readers
Get full text
184Citations
124Readers
Get full text
54Citations
13Readers
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ueda, T., Oki, T., & Koyanaka, S. (2017). Effect of particle shape on the stereological bias of the degree of liberation of biphase particle systems. Materials Transactions, 58(2), 280–286. https://doi.org/10.2320/matertrans.M-M2016837

Readers over time

‘16‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2500.751.52.253

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 7

70%

Researcher 3

30%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 7

78%

Earth and Planetary Sciences 2

22%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0