Cambiar para avanzar. Un análisis del debate sobre el itinerario formativo de la Psicología Clínica en España

  • Fernández Hermida J
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The training route in clinical psychology is the subject of much debate in the academic and professional world of Spanish psychology. This article critically analyzes the arguments of both the supporters and the opponents of the master’s degree in general health psychology as a necessary condition for access to specialized training. A bachelor’s degree - master’s - specialty route for training in clinical psychology is clearly defended, for logical, legal, and professional reasons, and for convergence with the Europsy model, and the opportunity to establish strong ties between the universities and the profession. It is concluded that the adoption of the route will not only strengthen the specialty and general health psychology, but it may also be one of the foundations on which the scientific and professional development of clinical psychology in Spain rests.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fernández Hermida, J. R. (2017). Cambiar para avanzar. Un análisis del debate sobre el itinerario formativo de la Psicología Clínica en España. Papeles Del Psicólogo - Psychologist Papers, 37(1), 81. https://doi.org/10.23923/pap.psicol2017.2827

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free