Alzheimer's “prevention” vs. “Risk reduction”: Transcending semantics for clinical practice

24Citations
Citations of this article
58Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The terms “prevention” and “risk reduction” are often used interchangeably in medicine. There is considerable debate, however, over the use of these terms in describing interventions that aim to preserve cognitive health and/or delay disease progression of Alzheimer's disease (AD) for patients seeking clinical care. Furthermore, it is important to distinguish between Alzheimer's disease prevention and Alzheimer's dementia prevention when using these terms. While prior studies have codified research-based criteria for the progressive stages of AD, there are no clear clinical consensus criteria to guide the use of these terms for physicians in practice. A clear understanding of the implications of each term will help guide clinical practice and clinical research. The authors explore the semantics and appropriate use of the terms “prevention” and “risk reduction” as they relate to AD in clinical practice.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hodes, J. F., Oakley, C. I., O’Keefe, J. H., Lu, P., Galvin, J. E., Saif, N., … Isaacson, R. S. (2019). Alzheimer’s “prevention” vs. “Risk reduction”: Transcending semantics for clinical practice. Frontiers in Neurology. Frontiers Media S.A. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2018.01179

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free