Comparison of Methods for Isolation and Confirmation of Clostridium perfringens from Spices and Herbs

  • De Boer E
  • Boot E
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Rapid Perfringens Medium (RPM), Perfringens Enrichment Medium (PEM) and Tryptose Sulfite Cycloserine agar medium (TSC) were compared for determination of Clostridium per-fringens in spices and herbs. Of 147 samples, 62 (42%) contained C. perfringens when RPM was used; lower percentages of positive isolations were found with PEM (23%), TSC surface plate (19%) and TSC pour plates (26%). Heat-treatment of sample sus-pensions yielded additional isolates. C. perfringens was isolated by one or more of the techniques from 43 (80%) of 54 different kinds of spices and herbs and from 86 (59%) of 147 samples. Replacing glucose in RPM with raffinose and polymyxin and neo-mycin with cycloserine did not improve the efficacy of this medium. A good correlation was found between conventional confirmation tests for C. perfringens and tests for acid phos-phatase, lecithinase, reverse CAMP test and an antiserum test.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

De Boer, E., & Boot, E. M. (1983). Comparison of Methods for Isolation and Confirmation of Clostridium perfringens from Spices and Herbs. Journal of Food Protection, 46(6), 533–536. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028x-46.6.533

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free