Adherence and preexisting major protease inhibitor resistance mutations are associated with virologic failure of a dual-class antiretroviral regimen with inhibitors of HIV-1 viral protease and integrase

4Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objectives: Novel treatment strategies are needed for treatment-experienced HIV-infected individuals. We retrospectively evaluated virologic outcomes on a dual-class, protease inhibitor (PI) plus raltegravir, antiretroviral (ARV) regimen. Methods: Virologic success was defined by a plasma HIV-RNA level ≤200 copies/mL. Adherence was measured using pharmacy refill data. The association between adherence and virologic failure was assessed using bivariate logistic regression. Results: In 39 individuals, median prior antiretroviral therapy (ART) exposure was 11 years. Of 39 individuals, 36 (92%) achieved an HIV-RNA ≤200 copies/mL. After a median follow-up of 328 days (interquartile range [IQR] 190-737 days), 74% maintained an HIV-RNA <200 copies/mL but only 44% had <50 copies/mL. Median adherence was 96.4% (IQR 83.3%-100%). For every 10% decrease in adherence, the odds of virologic failure increased by 90% (odds ratio [OR] = 1.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1-3.3). In all, 4 individuals had ≥2 preexisting major PI resistance mutations and all 4 had virologic failure. Conclusions: Most treatment-experienced individuals achieved virologic suppression on a dual-class regimen of a PI plus raltegravir. Success was limited by poor medication adherence and preexisting major PI resistance mutations. © SAGE Publications 2012.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gardner, E. M., Melendez, A. G., Astiz, M., & Bray, K. (2012). Adherence and preexisting major protease inhibitor resistance mutations are associated with virologic failure of a dual-class antiretroviral regimen with inhibitors of HIV-1 viral protease and integrase. Journal of the International Association of Physicians in AIDS Care, 11(1), 34–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545109711422124

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free