Reducing the Environmental Impact of Sterilization Packaging for Surgical Instruments in the Operating Room: A Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Disposable versus Reusable Systems

22Citations
Citations of this article
104Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The widespread use of single-use polypropylene packaging for sterilization of surgical instruments (blue wrap) results in enormous environmental pollution and plastic waste, estimated at 115 million kilograms on a yearly basis in the United States alone. Rigid sterilization containers (RSCs) are a well-known alternative in terms of quality and price. This paper deals with two research questions investigating the following aspects: (A) the environmental advantage of RCS for high volumes (5000 use cycles) in big hospitals, and (B) the environmental break-even point of use-cycles for small hospitals. An in-depth life cycle assessment was used to benchmark the two sys-tems. As such a benchmark is influenced by the indicator system, three indicator systems were ap-plied: (a) carbon footprint, (b) ReCiPe, and (c) eco-costs. The results are as follows: (1) the analyzed RSC has 85% less environmental impact in carbon footprint, 52% in ReCiPe, and 84.5% in eco-costs; and (2) an ecological advantage already occurs after 98, 228, and 67 out of 5000 use cycles, respec-tively. Given these two alternative packaging systems with comparable costs and quality, our results show that there are potentially large environmental gains to be made when RSC is preferred to blue wrap as a packaging system for sterile surgical instruments on a global scale.

References Powered by Scopus

ReCiPe2016: a harmonised life cycle impact assessment method at midpoint and endpoint level

2377Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Environmental impacts of the U.S. health care system and effects on public health

637Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

International comparison of health care carbon footprints

475Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

The impact of switching from single-use to reusable healthcare products: A transparency checklist and systematic review of life-cycle assessments

43Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Anaesthesia and environment: Impact of a green anaesthesia on economics

28Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The carbon footprint of cataract surgery in Spain

14Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Friedericy, H. J., van Egmond, C. W., Vogtländer, J. G., van der Eijk, A. C., & Jansen, F. W. (2022). Reducing the Environmental Impact of Sterilization Packaging for Surgical Instruments in the Operating Room: A Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Disposable versus Reusable Systems. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010430

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 20

57%

Researcher 9

26%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

9%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

9%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 16

52%

Engineering 9

29%

Nursing and Health Professions 4

13%

Materials Science 2

6%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free