Visual evaluation of the soil structure under different management systems in lowlands in southern Brazil

N/ACitations
Citations of this article
70Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The “Visual Evaluation of Soil Structure” (VESS) is a method used primarily to evaluate the soil structural quality of Oxisols in Brazil and secondly for more specific research, consultancy, and teaching purposes. Since the methodology was never applied and compared with laboratory evaluations of physical properties of hydromorphic soils of the Pampa biome in the south of Brazil, this study evaluated the use of VESS as a visual indicator of the structure quality of a typic eutrophic Albaqualf soil under native grassland, crop-livestock integration, no-tillage, and conventional management systems. Experimental areas with these different management systems were subjected to visual (VESS) and laboratory evaluation of the soil structure. The laboratory evaluation was based on traditional methods and on measurements of bulk density, porosity, aggregate mean weight diameter, aggregate tensile strength (ATS), and total organic carbon (TOC). It was concluded that VESS was efficient in differentiating the management system. The management systems based on minimum soil disturbance and mulching with crop residues improved the soil quality, as evidenced by the VESS scores, bulk density, porosity, aggregation, and organic carbon. The TOC content was inversely related with ATS. The quality of a typic eutrophic Albaqualf was benefitted by organic matter in the surface layer.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tuchtenhagen, I. K., de Lima, C. L. R., Bamberg, A. L., Guimarães, R. M. L., & Pulido-Moncada, M. (2018). Visual evaluation of the soil structure under different management systems in lowlands in southern Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Ciencia Do Solo, 42. https://doi.org/10.1590/18069657rbcs20170270

Readers over time

‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘250481216

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 30

79%

Researcher 6

16%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31

78%

Engineering 4

10%

Environmental Science 3

8%

Energy 2

5%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0