Seconding teachers to the academy: An alternative to traditional approaches of sessional staff employment

1Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

There is a multiplicity of challenges related to employing, supporting and retaining quality sessional (casual) academic staff in higher education. An approach trialled in an Australian education faculty specifically addressed issues of quality and quantity, support and inclusion, motivation and engagement, efficiency and effectiveness. While contextually relevant to an education faculty, the learning gained has potential for other faculties/institutions to provide modifications to traditional models of employing sessional staff. Amongst the significant benefits of a seconded teacher approach were greater engagement in the faculty, enhanced continuity and consistency of commitment compared to traditional models of employing sessional staff. An understanding of their changing professional identity and the strategic benefit to the faculty are emphasised in this paper as these staff provide a bridge across professional/cultural boundaries.

References Powered by Scopus

Becoming a teacher educator: Evidence from the field

469Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Professional identity development: A review of the higher education literature

438Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Relational interdependence between social and individual agency in work and working life

274Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Professional development for sessional staff in higher education: a review of current evidence

43Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Walkington, J. (2014). Seconding teachers to the academy: An alternative to traditional approaches of sessional staff employment. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 39(8), 108–122. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2014v39n8.7

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 4

67%

Researcher 2

33%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Arts and Humanities 3

43%

Social Sciences 2

29%

Physics and Astronomy 1

14%

Business, Management and Accounting 1

14%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free