When wittgenstein rejected phenomenological languages in 1929, he first could not accommodate rules (especially rules of language) in his new outlook. he had believed (he confessed) that a rule could be gathered from one single experience of using it correctly. this phenomenological conception is what he later criticized in denying that rule-following is a matter of having certain experiences. but a rule as a physicalistic entity (e.g., as a symbolic formula) cannot explain rule-following, either. it has to lay a role in some language-game, wittgenstein eventually argued. thus language-games are conceptually primary with respect to their rules.
CITATION STYLE
Hintikka, J. (1996). Rules, Games and Experiences: Wittgenstein’s Discussion of Rule-Following in the Light of His Development. In Ludwig Wittgenstein: Half-Truths and One-and-a-Half-Truths (pp. 315–333). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4109-9_14
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.