Some ethical principles for adult critical care.

4Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

State of the art in approaching several of the most disturbing problems involving end-of-life decision-making in an intensive care setting is applicable to other contexts as well. Developed as part of the curriculum at the John A. Burns School of Medicine at the University of Hawaii, the material is intended as a reflection of current work in health care ethics, strongly supported by literature, and generally consistent with current legal trends. But it also has developed into something of a consensus document, having been widely circulated in various versions, repeatedly presented to professional audiences dozens of times in Hawaii, and improved by countless comments and suggestions. The focus here is on the standards for withholding and withdrawing treatment. It should be noted that some important types of ethical problems are not covered: In particular, scarce resource problems (including some related questions involving medical futility), maternal-fetal and pediatric issues, and questions involving the notification of potentially affected third parties.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kipnis, K., & Gerhard, A. (1995). Some ethical principles for adult critical care. Hawaii Medical Journal, 54(4), 482–485. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-2552-5_11

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free