Extraterritorial obligations and the obligation to protect

7Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Since the late 1970s, what we today label ‘globalisation’ has altered many aspects of international law, not least international human rights law. This has been reflected inter alia in increased calls for universal respect for human rights beyond a state’s territorial border. The challenges to territoriality in this regard does not only relate to the actions of states abroad, but also with respect to their regulation of the conduct of business enterprises over which they exert significant influence. The chapter analyses the European Court of Human Rights’ jurisprudence and practice of the UN human rights bodies, and argues that extraterritorial human rights obligations have become an integral part of international human rights law. It is held that what has been seen as ‘exceptional’ now represent ‘common practice’. This conclusion is then applied to the discussion of the new treaty on human rights as currently being drafted.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Skogly, S. (2017). Extraterritorial obligations and the obligation to protect. In Netherlands Yearbook of International Law (Vol. 47, pp. 217–244). T.M.C. Asser Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-207-1_9

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free