The original version of the counter model for perceptual identification (Ratcliff & McKoon, 1997) assumed that word frequency and prior study act solely to bias the identification process (i.e., subjects have a tendency to prefer high-frequency and studied low-frequency words, irrespective of the presented word). In a recent study, using a two-alternative forced-choice paradigm, we showed an enhanced discriminability effect for high-frequency and studied low-frequency words (Wagenmakers, Zeelenberg, & Raaijmakers, 2000). These results have led to a fundamental modification of the counter model: Prior study and high frequency not only result in bias, but presumably also result in a higher rate of feature extraction (i.e., better perception). We demonstrate that a criterion-shift model, assuming limited perceptual information extracted from the flash as well as a reduced distance to an identification threshold for high-frequency and studied low-frequency words, can also account for enhanced discriminability.
CITATION STYLE
Wagenmakers, E. J., Zeelenberg, R., Schooler, L. J., & Raaijmakers, J. G. (2000). A criterion-shift model for enhanced discriminability in perceptual identification: a note on the counter model. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03213012
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.