Cross-Cultural Management Studies: State of the Field in the Four Research Paradigms*

66Citations
Citations of this article
251Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Cross-cultural management research is often confined to the positivist tradition, which is archetypically illustrated by the seminal work of Hofstede. However, this gives an incomplete overview of the field to which three additional research paradigms contribute: interpretivist, postmodern, and critical. Our ambition is to raise awareness of the presence of multiple paradigms in cross-cultural management research. This meta-theoretical positioning allows researchers to consider the insights and contributions from the different paradigms. We aim to achieve this by presenting a brief overview of the state of the field in each paradigm, thus, stressing areas of studies that enrich our understanding of the interaction between culture and management (at the national, organizational, interpersonal, and individual levels). We then highlight the specific contributions of these four paradigms, drawing especially upon the postmodern and critical works, as they have been repeatedly overlooked in reviews. The article concludes by mentioning how more interactions between the paradigms can be developed and can lead to further knowledge development.

References Powered by Scopus

The Effect of National Culture on the Choice of Entry Mode

4367Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Hofstede's model of national cultural differences and their consequences: A triumph of faith - A failure of analysis

1700Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A quarter century of culture's consequences: A review of empirical research incorporating Hofstede's cultural values framework

1541Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Balancing Rigour and Relevance: The Case for Methodological Pragmatism in Conducting Large-Scale, Multi-country and Comparative Management Studies

43Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Critical Cross-Cultural Management: Outline and Emerging Contributions

36Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Insider status: (Re)framing researcher positionality in international human resource management studies

25Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Romani, L., Barmeyer, C., Primecz, H., & Pilhofer, K. (2018). Cross-Cultural Management Studies: State of the Field in the Four Research Paradigms*. International Studies of Management and Organization, 48(3), 247–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/00208825.2018.1480918

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 93

79%

Lecturer / Post doc 12

10%

Researcher 10

9%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

2%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Business, Management and Accounting 60

58%

Social Sciences 26

25%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 10

10%

Arts and Humanities 8

8%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free