The impact of photometric redshift errors on lensing statistics in ray-tracing simulations

6Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Weak lensing surveys are reaching sensitivities at which uncertainties in the galaxy redshift distributions n(z) from photo-z errors degrade cosmological constraints. We use ray-tracing simulations and a simple treatment of photo-z errors to assess cosmological parameter biases from uncertainties in n(z) in an LSST-like survey. We use lensing peak counts and the power spectrum to infer cosmological parameters, and find that the latter is somewhat more resilient to photo-z errors. We place conservative lower limits on the survey size at which different types of photo-z errors significantly degrade (∼50 per cent)ΛCDM(cold darkmatter,wCDM) parameter constraints. A residual constant photo-z bias of |δz| <0.003(1 + z), the current LSST requirement, does not significantly degrade surveys smaller than ∼1300 (∼490) deg2 using peaks and ∼6500 (∼4900) deg2 using the power spectrum. Surveys smaller than ∼920 (∼450) deg2 and ∼4600 (∼4000) deg2 avoid 25 per cent degradation. Adopting a recent prediction for LSST's full photo-z probability distribution function (PDF), we find that simply approximating n(z) with the photo-z galaxy distribution computed from this PDF significantly degrades surveys as small as∼60 (∼65) deg2 using peaks or the power spectrum. If the centroid bias in each tomographic bin is removed from the photo-z galaxy distribution, using peaks or the power spectrum still significantly degrades surveys larger than ∼200 (∼255) or ∼248 (∼315) deg2; 25 per cent degradations occur at survey sizes of ∼140 (∼180) deg2 or ∼165 (∼210) deg2. These results imply that the expected broad photo-z PDF significantly biases parameters, which must be further mitigated using more sophisticated photo-z treatments.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Abruzzo, M. W., & Haiman, Z. (2019). The impact of photometric redshift errors on lensing statistics in ray-tracing simulations. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 486(2), 2730–2753. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz1016

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free