Inner-shelf response to cross-shelf wind stress: The importance of the cross-shelf density gradient in an idealized numerical model and field observations

33Citations
Citations of this article
69Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This study investigates the effects of horizontal and vertical density gradients on the inner-shelf response to cross-shelf wind stress by using an idealized numerical model and observations from a moored array deployed south of Martha's Vineyard, Massachusetts. In two-dimensional (no along-shelf variation) numerical model runs of an initially stratified shelf, a cross-shelf wind stress drives vertical mixing that results in a nearly well-mixed inner shelf with a cross-shelf density gradient because of the sloping bottom. The cross-shelf density gradient causes an asymmetric response to on- and offshore wind stresses. For density increasing offshore, an offshore wind stress drives a near-surface offshore flow and near-bottom onshore flow that slightly enhances the vertical stratification and the cross-shelf circulation. An onshore wind stress drives the reverse cross-shelf circulation reducing the vertical stratification and the cross-shelf circulation. A horizontal Richardson number is shown to be the nondimensional parameter that controls the dependence of the wind-driven nondimensional cross-shelf transport on the cross-shelf density gradient. Field observations show the same empirical relationship between the horizontal Richardson number and transport fraction as the model predicts. These results show that it is the cross-shelf rather than vertical density gradient that is critical to predicting the inner-shelf cross-shelf transport driven by a cross-shelf wind stress. © 2014 American Meteorological Society.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Horwitz, R., & Lentz, S. J. (2014). Inner-shelf response to cross-shelf wind stress: The importance of the cross-shelf density gradient in an idealized numerical model and field observations. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 44(1), 86–103. https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-13-075.1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free