Cis Regulatory Elements in Regulation of Plant Gene Expression: An Overview

Abstract

Gene expression is an extensively controlled process that occurs at various levels, transcription being one of the most crucial. It depends on a variety of interactions mediated by the core promoter region, sequence specific DNA binding proteins and their cognate promoter elements. Promoters comprise cis regulatory elements, clusters of short sequences that provide binding sites for transcription factors. According to PLACE database, there are 469 cis regulatory elements present in plants. The ACGT core sequence has been established as a functionally important cis element in several promoters that respond to different stimuli like light, anaerobiosis, jasmonic acid and hormones such as salicylic acid, abscisic acid and auxin. It frequently regulates gene expression in synergy with other cis elements (DRE, CRE, LRE, etc). Promoter activity is largely affected by the copy number, inter motif distance, position, deletions or mutations in the core sequences of the cis regulatory regions. Our research is aimed at understanding the mechanistics of transcriptional regulation, focusing on the role of cis regulatory modules in regulation of gene expression. We did comparative genomic analysis of four different plant genomes. Results indicated that certain spacer lengths are preferred over others that suggests that these lengths might be involved in vital physiological processes. Using gene expression databases we also observed trends suggesting that co occuring ACGT elements are responsible for gene regulation in response to exogenous stress. Conservation in patterns of ACGT (N) ACGT among orthologous genes also indicated the possibility that emergence of functional significance across species was a result of parallel evolution of these cis elements [1]. Another study from our group in Arabidopsis thaliana indicated that two copies of ACGT elements separated by 5 nucleotides gave the highest activation of the reporter gene which imparted salicylic acid inducibility. However, a spacer length of 25 nucleotides allowed the promoter to be induced by abscisic acid but not salicylic acid. The differential induction is expected to involve the recruitment of different bZIP transcription factors. This suggests that a change in spacing between two copies of a given motif can alter the signal pathway to which a promoter responds [2].