Habermas's European constitution: Catalyst, reconstruction, refounding

8Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Jürgen Habermas has long been one of the EU's most prominent and influential critical friends, engaged as much at the level of legal and political praxis as social theory. In particular, he has a close and complex longstanding interest in the idea of an EU constitution. On the occasion of his 90th birthday, I want to discuss three treatments of the EU constitution located in Habermas's work: constitution as catalyst, as reconstruction, and as refounding. We find the different treatments, and the priorities that underscore them, emphasised at different times—partly reflecting changing political circumstances. We also observe some tension between the different approaches. Yet, as someone broadly sympathetic to his overall project, I argue that the best understanding of the Habermasian position, and certainly the most attractive version of that position in today's political climate, involves reconciling all three treatments within a single package.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Walker, N. (2019). Habermas’s European constitution: Catalyst, reconstruction, refounding. European Law Journal, 25(5), 508–514. https://doi.org/10.1111/eulj.12341

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free