Tracing the (Hidden) Spatialities of Digital Agendas: The Case of 'Digital Hungary'

3Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Policies that aim at bringing about a digital transformation (seek to) create the conditions for particular spatial development trajectories. Yet, the understandings, explicit and implicit, of space advanced by digital agendas have remained rather underexposed to date. This paper addresses this gap by developing a Foucauldian-inspired discourse-analytical framework and applies it to the programme of 'Digital Hungary'. It is argued that policies of digitalisation in Hungary only to a minor extent consider the spatial dimension, and their impact potentially undermines the declared aims of spatial development at different scales.

References Powered by Scopus

The end of geography or the explosion of place? Conceptualizing space, place and information technology

482Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The treatment of space and place in the new strategic spatial planning in Europe

462Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

How does europeanization affect CEE governance? Conditionally, diffusion and diversity

415Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Discourses and practices of the smart city in Central Eastern Europe: insights from Hungary’s ‘big’ cities

14Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Hubs, hopes and high stakes for a relatively disadvantaged low tech place

10Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Towards a multiscalar perspective on the prospects of ‘the actually existing smart village’ – A view from Hungary

8Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Varró, K. (2020). Tracing the (Hidden) Spatialities of Digital Agendas: The Case of “Digital Hungary.” European Spatial Research and Policy, 26(2), 135–150. https://doi.org/10.18778/1231-1952.26.2.07

Readers over time

‘20‘21‘22‘23‘25036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 6

60%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

20%

Researcher 2

20%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 6

55%

Arts and Humanities 2

18%

Engineering 2

18%

Business, Management and Accounting 1

9%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0