How to (better) find a perpetrator in a haystack

8Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In many real-world contexts, there is a pressing need to automatically screen for potential perpetrators, such as school shooters, whose prevalence in the population is extremely low. We first explain one possible obstacle in addressing this challenge, which is the confusion between “recognition” and “localization” during a search process. Next, we present a pragmatic screening methodology to the problem along Jaynes Bayesian hypothesis testing procedure. According to this approach, we should first focus our efforts on reducing the size of the haystack rather than on the identification of the needle. The third and major methodological contribution of the paper is in proposing that we may reduce the size of the haystack through the identification and use of unique data cues we describe as “impostors’ cues”. An experiment performed on an artificial data set of 7000 texts, shows that when incorporating these cues in the hypothesis testing procedure, they significantly improve the automatic screening of objects characterized by an attribute of a low prevalence (i.e. a psychopathic signature). The relevance of the proposed approach for Big Data and Homeland security is explained and discussed.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Neuman, Y., Cohen, Y., & Neuman, Y. (2019). How to (better) find a perpetrator in a haystack. Journal of Big Data, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40537-019-0172-9

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free