Categorizing the social context of the wildland urban interface: Adaptive capacity for wildfire and community “Archetypes”

Abstract

Understanding the local context that shapes collective response to wildfire risk continues to be a challenge for scientists policymakers. This study utilizes expands on a conceptual approach for understanding adaptive capacity to wildfire in a comparison of 18 past case studies. The intent is to determine whether comparison of local social context and community characteristics across cases can identify community “archetypes” that approach wildfire planning mitigation in consistently different ways. Identification of community archetypes serves as a potential strategy for collaborating with diverse populations at risk from wildfire designing tailored messages related to wildfire risk mitigation. Our analysis uncovered four consistent community archetypes that differ in terms of the local social context and community characteristics that continue to influence response to wildfire risk. Differences among community archetypes include local communication networks, reasons for place attachment or community identity, distrust of government, actions undertaken to address issues of forest health esthetics. Results indicate that the methodological approach advanced in this study can be used to draw more consistent lessons across case studies provide the means to test different communication strategies among archetypes.