Occupational justice health questionnaire: Reflections on its application1

3Citations
Citations of this article
61Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Introduction: Occupational justice concept is defined as the equal access and participation in all occupations, including the resources required for participation and opportunities for social inclusion. Occupational justice not only remains conceptually ambiguous for occupational therapy practice but also lacks critical examination of its applicability to non-Western cultures. Objective: This article describes the reflexive process exercised by the researchers during and after using the Occupational Justice Health Questionnaire (OJHQ) as an occupational therapy tool in a substance addiction rehabilitation setting in the Philippines. Method: This qualitative study gathered transcriptions from field notes and focus group discussions of the authors. These transcriptions were characterized by the authors' reflections on their experiences using the OJHQ on four distinct periods: 1) OJHQ translation, 2) pilot testing, 3) OJHQ-Filipino version administration, and 4) project conclusion. Data were analyzed through thematic analysis. Results: Qualitative data revealed four themes: Tool usefulness; administration guidelines; contextualized use of the tool; and nuances of occupational injustices in substance addiction and rehabilitation setting. Conclusion: Findings expanded OJHQ's purpose to enhance clinical reasoning, promote justice-oriented health care, activate reflective practice, and recognize the interweaving and evolving nature of injustices. This article offers an understanding of how reflections can facilitate cultural adaptation of practice tools used in occupational therapy and justice practice.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sy, M. P., Roraldo, M. P. N. R., Reyes, R. C. R. D., Yao, D. P. G., & Pineda, R. C. S. (2021). Occupational justice health questionnaire: Reflections on its application1. Brazilian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 29. https://doi.org/10.1590/2526-8910.CTOAO2244

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free