Navigating the role of the principal investigator: A comparison of four cases

25Citations
Citations of this article
77Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Principal investigators are the lead actors on projects at the forefront of nascent technologies, yet few studies have explored the personal actions and experiences of PIs as they navigate their roles. I investigated principal investigators and their approach to new boundary spanning and entrepreneurial roles. Following a multiple case study methodology with a combination of interviews and observation, four PIs in nanotechnology related fields are explored in three dimensions: career and institutional alignment, boundary spanning activities and the tensions created in the still largely uncharted waters of nanotechnology commercialization. I found that these PIs actively sought organizational alignment that allowed them "to make things happen" while keeping harmony between the university and enterprise. The PIs demonstrated boundary-spanning activities, in particular a propensity for welcoming strangers into their labs in the hopes of finding new knowledge and opportunities, and practicing "good grantsmanship" to convert these new relations into collaboration. I found that the PIs managed tensions related to academic progression and lack of institutional support. Through this study, I offer researchers an opportunity to hear the voice of PIs on these topics and seek to contribute to our understanding of PIs as critical actors in the pursuit of science. © 2012 Springer Science+Business Media New York.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kidwell, D. K. (2014). Navigating the role of the principal investigator: A comparison of four cases. Journal of Technology Transfer, 39(1), 33–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-012-9276-5

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free