Measurable residual disease in multiple myeloma: Ready for clinical practice?

24Citations
Citations of this article
48Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The landscape of multiple myeloma (MM) has changed considerably in the past two decades regarding new treatments, insight into disease biology and innovation in the techniques available to assess measurable residual disease (MRD) as the most accurate method to evaluate treatment efficacy. The sensitivity and standardization achieved by these techniques together with unprecedented rates of complete remission (CR) induced by new regimens, raised enormous interest in MRD as a surrogate biomarker of patients' outcome and endpoint in clinical trials. By contrast, there is reluctance and general lack of consensus on how to use MRD outside clinical trials. Here, we discuss critical aspects related with the implementation of MRD in clinical practice.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Burgos, L., Puig, N., Cedena, M. T., Mateos, M. V., Lahuerta, J. J., Paiva, B., & San-Miguel, J. F. (2020, June 22). Measurable residual disease in multiple myeloma: Ready for clinical practice? Journal of Hematology and Oncology. BioMed Central. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13045-020-00911-4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free