How (Maximally) Contextual Is Quantum Mechanics?

  • Simmons A
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Proofs of Bell-Kochen-Specker contextuality demonstrate that there exists sets of projectors that cannot each be assigned either 0 or 1 such that each basis formed from them contains exactly one 1-assigned projector. Instead, at least some of the projectors must have a valuation that depends on the \emph{context} in which they are measured. This motivates the question of \emph{how many} of the projectors must have contextual valuations. In this paper, we demonstrate a bound on what fraction of rank-1 projective measurements on a quantum system must be considered to have context-dependent valuations as a function of the quantum dimension, and show that quantum mechanics is not as contextual, by this metric, as other possible physical theories. Attempts to find quantum mechanical scenarios that yield a high value of this figure-of-merit can be thought of as generalisations or extensions of the search for small Kochen-Specker sets. We also extend this result to projector-valued-measures with projectors of arbitrary equal rank.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Simmons, A. W. (2020). How (Maximally) Contextual Is Quantum Mechanics? (pp. 505–519). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34316-3_23

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free