Purpose: Immunecheckpointblockades(ICB)havebeensuccessfulingastriccancer (GC).However,themajorityofunselectedpatientswithGCfailtorespondtoICB.Itis crucialtoidentifyprecisebiomarkerstopredictresponsetoICB. Methods: Geneexpressionprofilingofformalin-fixedandparaffin-embeddedGCtissues from25patientstreatedwithICB(pembrolizumab)targetingprogrammedcelldeathpro-tein1(PD-1)wasperformedusingNanoString(NanoStringTechnologies).Fordevelop-mentofagenesignaturetopredictresponsetoICB,differentialgeneexpressionanalysis withlinearregressionmodelingwasperformedwithareaunderthecurvepackagesinR. Results: Fromtheanalysis,10genesweredifferentiallyexpressedbetweenpatientswith responseandnoresponsetoICB(P< 0.01).Toidentifyabiomarkerpredictingresponseto ICB,fourgeneswereselectedbasedon|log 2 (foldchange)|≥ 1.AftercalculatingtheIMmu-notherapyAgainstGastrIcCancer(IMAGiC)score,patientsweredividedintotwogroups:to beresponderandtobenon-responder,accordingtoResponseEvaluationCriteriainSolid Tumors(RECIST)guidelines.TheIMAGiCscorewassignificantlyassociatedwithRECIST groups(P = 0.0057),Epstein-Barrvirus(P = 0.048),andtumormutationalload(P = 0.023); however,wasnotsignificantlycorrelatedwithmicrosatelliteinstabilitystatus(P = 0.14) andprogrammeddeathligand1(PD-L1)expression(P= 0.095).ToreproduceIMAGiCwith differenttechnology,weretestedtheresultswithaquantitativereal-timepolymerase chainreaction(qRT-PCR)method,andtheprecisionofreproductionof87.5%.Invalida-tioncohortwith17samplesfromtheongoingtrialwithnivolumab,theprecisionofIMAG-iCqRT-PCRwas100%. Conclusion: OuridentifiedgenesignaturesandproposedIMAGiCmodelforpredicting responsetopembrolizumabinpatientswithGCshowedvalidity.
CITATION STYLE
Heo, Y. J., Kang, S. Y., Kim, S. T., Kang, W. K., Lee, J., & Kim, K.-M. (2019). Combined biomarker for prediction of response to an immune checkpoint inhibitor in metastatic gastric cancer. Precision and Future Medicine, 3(4), 165–175. https://doi.org/10.23838/pfm.2019.00079
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.