Lower oesophageal sphincter pressure and timed barium oesophagogram: Two objective parameters in the non-invasive assessment of primary achalasia

14Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: The non-invasive assessment of primary achalasia is not precise. Aim: To compare investigations before and 1 month after balloon dilation in achalasia. Methods: Fifty-two patients with primary achalasia were enrolled. Subjective and objective variables of oesophageal functions were analysed before and 1 month after balloon dilation. Results: The mean predilation symptom score, lower oesophageal sphincter pressure, height and volume of barium at 5 min were 7.7 ± 2.6, 62.0 ± 25.1 mmHg, 9.2 ± 6.1 cm and 53.2 ± 49.8 mL respectively; the mean postdilation values were 3.0 ± 3.0, 34.1 ± 12.5 mmHg, 7.9 ± 5.1 cm and 28.0 ± 30.1 mL respectively. The before dilation volume of barium at 5 min correlates significantly with lower oesophageal sphincter pressure (P < 0.01). The mean symptom scores, lower oesophageal sphincter pressure and volume of barium at 5 min dropped significantly after intervention (P < 0.01), but the reduction in barium height at 5 min was not significant. The percentage changes in volume at 5 min significantly predicted the percentage changes in lower oesophageal sphincter pressure (P < 0.01). Conclusions: The volume of barium retention at 5 min can predict the lower oesophageal sphincter pressure before and after balloon dilation in primary achalasia. This could be used as a non-invasive objective tool for initial and post-dilation assessment. © 2005 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Montazeri, G., Nouri, N., Estakhri, A., Shirani, S., Derakhshan, M. H., Yaghoobi, M., … Malekzadeh, R. (2005). Lower oesophageal sphincter pressure and timed barium oesophagogram: Two objective parameters in the non-invasive assessment of primary achalasia. Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 22(3), 261–265. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2036.2005.02557.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free